What does 100 points mean to you - perfection,
excellence or just a number of another prejudiced system? In the world of wines, full-marks could
translate to “extraordinary” in
many people’s opinion, or pure “subjectivity” of one’s preferential wine styles. However extreme that
can be, scores serve practical purposes and will remain for wine, so they do and will for education systems.
can be, scores serve practical purposes and will remain for wine, so they do and will for education systems.
![]() |
| Pontet-Canet RP100 Master Class |
When it came to
a tasting event titled “Pontet Canet
RP100 Master Class” I was simply keen to find out if the wines lived up to
the expectation, whereas Pontet-Canet, a fifth-growth of the famous 1855 Classification,
its wines have been rated in recent years consistently high as first and second
growths’ and was named second only after DRC
at Power 100’s by fine wine exchange
Liv-ex in 2012.
The tasting was
hosted by Melanie Tesseron, co-owner of Chateau Pontet-Canet, a gracious
lady. Her wine was apparently the
spotlight (wine list and tasting notes to follow), but no less was the estate’s
endeavour in biodynamics that constituted main part of the talk and discussion
on the day. In relations to that, I did
some research too.
To begin with the
end, I have discovered much more than the wines themselves - far exceeded my
expectation - There are great people behind great wines: Bold, Persistent, Committed, yet Open-minded.
![]() |
| A horse working around Pontet-Canet |
Alfred Tesseron, Pontet-Canet’s
President and Melanie’s uncle, boldly decided to go biodynamic in 2004, an idea
not popular in Bordeaux back then and not even now. Some think biodynamic is a gimmick – cow dung
fertiliser, grape picking with reference to lunar calendar, horse-ploughing,
etc - and Bordeaux doesn’t need that.
Well, back to five or ten years ago, a biodynamic wine did not appeal me
more than a “regular” one, but it is the opposite today. Are Bordeaux winemakers too arrogant in
reliance on its world class frame? Biodynamics
costs money, affects profit obviously – but it’s happening far more vigorous at
Burgundy and Lorie Valley, like a trend.
The only fair, I think, and biggest argument is the weather, Atlantic
climate and rains bring extra obstacles.
The stake will be high if you are not allowed to spray chemically for
prevention or killing of mildew – an every Bordeaux vigneron’s nightmare. This may be particular true if you own a big
vineyard (compared to Burgundy’s) and is renowned as a quality Chateau such as
Pontet-Canet, since 1855. It earned its
official Biodyvin certificate in
2010 - the first grand cru classé
who did that against all odds.
![]() |
| Biodynamics, a holistic approach |
Certification did
not happen automatically. It took time,
effort - the persistence - not only money, to achieve substantial result. Biodynamics is a holistic farming approach,
like Chinese medicine as Alfred Tesseron described. It looks at all aspects affecting the grapes,
its roots, vines, fertiliser, the soil, pressure on soil, diseases, forces
& cycles in nature and etc. To
produce good wine and to show the characteristic of the terroir, you have to go
back to the soils and nature, but chemicals destroyed it, Jean-Michel Comme,
the technical director believed.
Biodynamic restores life, but not in one day, and you don’t see all
possible problems and be able to deal with them in a click. Pontet-Canet’s journey of biodynamics is not
without setback. In 2007, a rainy year, Alfred
Tesseron and Jean-Michel Comme decided to spray chemicals to combat the mildew,
or there could be a total loss of crops.
That is a decision they regret later.
Not only the soil was “affected” but it also meant they had to spend
another three year at minimum if they wanted to be awarded Biodyvin. Then, you either abandon the whole idea, or carry
on. They chose the latter, devastated
but not giving up, only enlightened, Comme realised it’s a lesson learnt: to
see diseases as warning of problems.
![]() |
|
Melanie Tesseron, Alfred
Tesseron, Jean-Michel
Comme (L-R), masterminds of Pontet-Canet |
![]() |
| Alfred Tesseron thinking to invest on staples |
While Alfred Tesseron
embraces biodynamics, he has been open-minded in other wine making
practices. He hired Michel Rolland as
consultant, a winemaker who is not convinced of biodynamic and is better known
for his work at Right Bank garagistes (garage wine), a cult wine, a style over
substance, as some commentators described.
However, what Tesseron wanted was an alternative view, an external eye
to Pontet-Canet; he did not blindly follow every advice given. He also tried using amphorae (a clay jar, its
history be traced back to ancient Greek) and concrete eggs vat (an innovative
equipment at a time) in vinification. When
he thought the concrete eggs were “less good,” he simply admitted it.
![]() |
| Melanie Tesseron, "to respect the wine, you must first respect the vine" |
Melanie led the class to taste them from the oldest to youngest, quite different from other tastings, which started usually the other way around, but then, why not when every wine is unique!
![]() |
| Master Class: Pontet-Canet six vintages 1996, 2000, 2001, 2003, 2006, 2009 |
1996 – Most
enjoyable one on the day. Medium ruby,
crimson colour; elegant cedar, leather and tobacco, then dark fruit came to the
nose; pepper, leather and liquorice with dark berries surfacing on to the
palate; good acidity and lot of tannins, a velvety one. Fragrances and flavours evolved and lingered in a structured
and balanced way, from grapes harvested 18 years ago.
2000 – My second best
of wine-of-the-day. Medium ruby,
slight garnet with orange rim; similar but more prominent fruit on nose and
palate compared to 1996’s; blackberries, leather, dry herbs, and more mint and
spices gradually came to the mouth. Outstanding.
2001 – Ruby crimson
with orange rim. Soft fresh berries, leather, earthy mushroom aromas; cherry,
mulberry, a touch of spice with chewy tannins on palate. Flavours developed and surfaced very slowly
and nicely.
2003 – Medium ruby
red; ripe juicy red berries and hint of leather on noise and palate with gritty
tannin. Not the year of best weather for
grapes but it’s still delicious.
2006 – Ruby red
with thin clear rim; mushroom, liquorice and ripe dark cherry on nose;
plentiful of blackberry and supple dark fruit on palate, coupled with spices and
firm tannins.
2009 – Loved this
one, a keeper, only be better in 5 or 10 more years. Very concentrated flavours; they exploded, not in a forceful way. Darker ruby in
colour; mushroom, blackberries, earthy beetroot, leather rushed into the nose;
layers of liquorice, aniseed, berry, leather intertwined, intense and fused on
palate; tannins was very firm but not grainy.
Everything lingered for a long while.
Excellent wine!
That is not the end
of my diary. As a participant, I later
received a personal note from Melanie, welcoming my visit to Chateau
Pontet-Canet if I am travelling to France. Lovely!
That again reminded me how and why their wines impressed people.
![]() |
| Melanie Tesseron (right), staunch believer &.successful practitioner of Biodynamics, well proven via great wines and great people |
#wine #finewine #bordeaux
#frenchwine #perfection








.jpg)
沒有留言:
發佈留言